|
<
| Recent Articles |
A Secret No One Tells New Managers
The Merriam-Webster dictionary lists two meanings for "confrontation." There are "a face-to-face meeting" and "the clashing of forces or ideas." Both are part of being a boss, but hardly anyone tells that to a new manager in advance. You could say that managing others is...
Strategies For Hiring The Best Employees
A few years ago I wrote a column in which I compared managing employees to herding cats: just when you think you have everyone organized in a happy little group and going in the same direction one cat breaks...
Leadership: Take Away Their Excuses
Excuses. If you're responsible for the performance of a group, you've heard excuses. Your job is to get rid of those excuses. With excuses gone, the real slackers stand out from the crowd. Then you can concentrate on rewarding and supporting your producers. You can...
Employee Performance Appraisal - Ideal...
Conventional wisdom says that there's no such thing as a perfect employee performance appraisal form. And with so many sorry examples of appraisal forms around, conventional wisdom might almost seem correct.
Leadership As A Boss In The Workplace
Do you give your employees the type of leadership in the workplace that they come to expect? What is it that you think they do expect from you as the boss? It is hard to give everyone something that they can take with...
What Your Workers Want From You
Workers are human beings. That may seem obvious to you, but because of that simple
fact, we've got decades of behavioral science research that can help us understand what they want. Here are ten things...
Managing The Workforce Of Tomorrow
If you are in a leadership position today, here are ten ideas to help you successfully lead the newest generation of workers-Millennials or Gen X. They are different and here is why. 1.Provide a Structured Environment: Gen X workers may well be the most protected...
|
|
|
03.12.07
Positive Approach To Employee Discipline
By Dick Grote
Smoothing the Consequences of Miscounduct with Accountability
For seventy-five years, American organizations have used a fairly standardized procedure to handle familiar personnel problems such as absenteeism, poor performance, and other misconduct. This approach, usually called "progressive discipline," provides for an increasingly serious series of penalties - reprimands, warnings, suspensions without pay - when employees fall out of step with the organization's expectations. When problems arise, the job of the manager is to find the punishment that fits the crime.
But today, a growing number of companies are moving away from using a criminal-justice mentality for employee performance improvement through corrective action. They are abandoning traditional approaches that focus exclusively on punishment. Instead, they are adopting an approach of accountability - employees with unfavorable performance, conduct or attendance issues are required to take personal responsibility for their choice of behavior.
Discipline and Recognition
One immediate difference is that traditional, punishment-based discipline systems ignore the great majority of people who never create disciplinary problems. In a non-punitive, "Discipline Without Punishment" approach, there's a new step added to the process - a positive contact. Just as the policy is expected to resolve employee problems when they arise, it also makes clear that supervisors are expected to recognize employees when they perform well.
Recognizing good performance is no longer just good advice handed out in a management training class. Now it's a formal policy requirement, a step of the organization's overall discipline procedure.
Diffusing Problems
Supervisors continue to be responsible for beginning the correction process by employee coaching prior to formal disciplinary action. The exception is when the magnitude of the behavior warrants serious disciplinary action or even termination for a first offense.
In the early stages of disciplinary action, the Discipline Without Punishment approach replaces the familiar responses of verbal reprimands and written warnings with two comparable steps toward employee performance improvement: Reminder 1 and Reminder 2. Yes, they seem similar, but there's more than mere semantic sleight-of-hand at work here.
Instead of being reprimanded for his mischief or warned about what will happen the next time he misbehaves, the employee is formally reminded of two important things. First, he's reminded of the organization's exact expectations of high-quality work, on-time performance, or whatever else has triggered the need for the discussion. And second, he is reminded that he has a responsibility for meeting the organization's standards - he must do what he's being paid to do and he must do it well.
The Last Chance
The biggest change from the traditional, punishment-based approach comes at the final step of disciplinary action. When the employee is one step away from termination, a dramatic gesture is needed to forcefully drive home the message that the end is at hand - one more time and you're fired. But merely giving the employee a "final written warning," or placing her on probation for some period of time, or creating a employee performance improvement plan aren't powerful enough to clearly communicate the message "Once more and you're out!" That's why a disciplinary suspension from work is the best final step for a corrective action system.
Withholding Pay Does Not Work
Traditionally, this disciplinary suspension has been without pay. The intent is that by depriving the employee of pay, he will come to his senses and return to work determined to do whatever is necessary to keep his job.
But the theory rarely works in practice. Employees who are placed on a three-day disciplinary suspension without pay don't often return having seen the error of their ways and a commitment to excellent performance. They usually come back angry, all the organization has accomplished is creating a bitter employee.
There are other problems with using punishment as the basis for disciplinary action. Supervisors, many of whom are in the tricky position of being both on-the-job boss as well as off-the-job friend, often hesitate to place friends on an unpaid disciplinary suspension.
Continue reading this article.
About the Author:
Dick Grote has been a management consultant
for almost thirty years, exclusively specializing in the field
of employee performance improvement and management. Visit:
http://www.groteconsulting.com/
|
